In what can only be described as unnerving at best to what the
United States Constitution was supposed to mean to all of its citizens,
two states have decided that their children?s education should come under
the influence of a specific religion. Indiana and South Dakota have both
passed legislation to allow the Ten Commandments to be posted on the walls
of their public schools. The questions and the motives that have arisen
out of this inane and selfish move has brought a very old debate back into
the forefront. The separation of church and state.
The United States was founded (and I use the term very loosely)
by Catholics and settled (once again, very loose term) by Puritans in the
form of Pilgrims. As soon as it was distinguished that we were a nation
and that we were going to be separate from Great Britain it was decided
that religion was not going to be a part of what made or broke a citizen
in this country. Granted, the citizens of this country have found ways
of oppressing non-Christian religions since the so called open minds of
the founding fathers constructed blueprints for this country, but yet their
still should be no reason why the government itself should be involved.
So why has this issue arisen all of a sudden? Considering the
Bible and the ten commandments along with it has been around for 2000 odd
years, you think that at least someone would have thought of this idea
before. Well, unfortunately you need a school shooting like the one that
occurred a year ago at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado for
this sort of thing to happen. In response to that particular shooting as
well as similar cases in Oregon, Kentucky and Arkansas, many people believe
that having the ten commandments on the wall would help bring back a moral
responsibility to kids that they had never heard before. By exposing kids
to such words as ?Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor? and ?Thou shalt not
commit adultery? kids are more prone to act like the fine young boys and
girls that their parents expect them to be, and less prone to act out in
violent ways that would lead them to go on a murderous rampage. I know
doesn?t even look ridiculous in writing?
What many advocates for these types of measures don?t realize
is that this is far from being the solution to our problems. For many of
these child killers, preventive measures like putting words on the wall
would never have stopped them in the first place. When the bullies at Columbine
High School picked on Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris, the Ten Commandments
would have done nothing to stop them. How do you explain that to a child?
Now I don?t justify what those kids did. That was obviously wrong. Yet,
it seems that they themselves would have been immune to the whole effect
that the Ten Commandments is supposed to have, had it been posted at their
high school. Not only that, but even if they had, would killers like that
have even cared about what these words say or even mean. I myself was never
raised in a religious household, but just by pop culture alone, I now what
most of the Ten Commandments are, at least the important ones. Having them
posted on the wall would not have factored in any of the cases so far.
In fact I?m sure that the killers were very aware of the Ten Commandments
even if they weren?t printed on the wall of their school.
What this basically comes down to is that these people are trying
to use a preventive measure that would not be effective and only cause
problems in other ways. Imagine anyone not of a Judeo-Christian heritage
coming into class the first day and being told that what you have been
brought up to believe is for the most part hogwash. Now factor in that
you would be a very impressionable child and the idea becomes more clear
as to why this wrong for schools of this country. The measure would single
out one religion and its traditions over any others that might not have
the same beliefs or teachings. Not only that but the first four Commandments
have nothing to do with a moral code in the first place. They specify the
special relationship between God and his chosen people. That of course
excludes Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, Baha?is, and Spiritists, not to mention
atheists and agnostics as well.
What is most disheartening about the whole problem is the way
that some people have rallied around the issue as if it?s the savior of
all of the United States? problems. Last summer the House of Representatives
passed a bill allowing states to use the Ten Commandments in federal buildings.
However, this measure will probably be ruled down as unconstitutional by
the Supreme Court as they did in 1994 when they disallowed the Ten Commandments
to be posted in courthouses. Recently 41 member of Congress passed a resolution
that they would hang the Commandments in their offices and anywhere else
that they saw fit. ?It is unconstitutional,? claimed Anita Bowser a Democrat
State Senator from Michigan City, Indiana. ?It will so be declared by the
Supreme Court of the United States.? She also said that legislators are
aware that it violates the first amendment, ?they?re so worried about the
election coming up they?ll prostitute their beliefs for a vote.?
For many of the states involved the argument is that the Ten
Commandments are a historical document that should be posted along with
the rest of the things that this country is based on. Yet, why should schools
celebrate this country?s monotheistic upbringing, which it has never really
been in the first place. The only reason people think it is, is because
the rich (who control what is history) were mostly of Judeo-Christian heritage.
It is not that I disagree with the teachings of the Ten Commandments,
of course I agree with them. What is most distressing about the issue is
that the same people who advocate this countries freedom and spirit completely
downplay our entire Constitution when they support ideas like this. By
making quick decisions like this to prevent such tragedies like the one
at Columbine High School it sends the wrong messages to kids and especially
adults who should know better.
Links: Americans United for Separation of Church and State. www.au.org